Comments on: A Bad Sign Of Online Usage http://www.goingthewongway.com/2007/06/04/a-bad-sign-of-online-usage/ I'm ALWAYS going the Wong way Mon, 01 Dec 2008 20:53:07 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5 By: Derek http://www.goingthewongway.com/2007/06/04/a-bad-sign-of-online-usage/#comment-565 Derek Tue, 05 Jun 2007 04:54:30 +0000 http://www.goingthewongway.com/2007/06/04/a-bad-sign-of-online-usage/#comment-565 @chil Yeah if someone is 1. lazy enough to do it online and 2. even lazier as proved by the fact that they can't spell out the words then the answer has got to be no. Otherwise you'll have a life with someone who will <b>never</b> do that little extra bit. And that is bad news. @good looking guy named mat You sure do have fun with making up different nicknames. In any case, I'm not sure if I would say that those acronyms are "nerdy." I would say that they are pretty lame, though. And dorky. But if that's what you meant by nerdy, as opposed to highly intellectual, then I suppose so. @chil
Yeah if someone is 1. lazy enough to do it online and 2. even lazier as proved by the fact that they can’t spell out the words then the answer has got to be no. Otherwise you’ll have a life with someone who will never do that little extra bit. And that is bad news.

@good looking guy named mat
You sure do have fun with making up different nicknames. In any case, I’m not sure if I would say that those acronyms are “nerdy.” I would say that they are pretty lame, though. And dorky. But if that’s what you meant by nerdy, as opposed to highly intellectual, then I suppose so.

]]> By: good looking guy named mat http://www.goingthewongway.com/2007/06/04/a-bad-sign-of-online-usage/#comment-564 good looking guy named mat Mon, 04 Jun 2007 21:17:51 +0000 http://www.goingthewongway.com/2007/06/04/a-bad-sign-of-online-usage/#comment-564 wow, those are some of the nerdiest acronyms i've ever seen. wow, those are some of the nerdiest acronyms i’ve ever seen.

]]> By: chil http://www.goingthewongway.com/2007/06/04/a-bad-sign-of-online-usage/#comment-563 chil Mon, 04 Jun 2007 19:46:30 +0000 http://www.goingthewongway.com/2007/06/04/a-bad-sign-of-online-usage/#comment-563 :( it cut off the rest of my comment! :( i was saying that the "hahahahhaha" meant that i was more than just a little amused, but not quite laughing out loud yet :) :( it cut off the rest of my comment! :(

i was saying that the “hahahahhaha” meant that i was more than just a little amused, but not quite laughing out loud yet :)

]]> By: chil http://www.goingthewongway.com/2007/06/04/a-bad-sign-of-online-usage/#comment-562 chil Mon, 04 Jun 2007 19:45:10 +0000 http://www.goingthewongway.com/2007/06/04/a-bad-sign-of-online-usage/#comment-562 just last night i was reading tricia's xanga post on using GOL. personally, i never use LOL unless i truly AM laughing out loud, but even then, i think i tend to use capital/multiple "haha"s to express the extent of my amusement. WYGOWM is by far my favorite... mostly b/c if you are LAME enough to know what it means, maybe you aren't offended that the other person was lame (and lazy) enough to use it! hahahahhaha ( just last night i was reading tricia’s xanga post on using GOL. personally, i never use LOL unless i truly AM laughing out loud, but even then, i think i tend to use capital/multiple “haha”s to express the extent of my amusement.

WYGOWM is by far my favorite… mostly b/c if you are LAME enough to know what it means, maybe you aren’t offended that the other person was lame (and lazy) enough to use it! hahahahhaha (

]]>