<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Figured Out My Personality Type?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.goingthewongway.com/2008/01/23/figured-out-my-personality-type/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.goingthewongway.com/2008/01/23/figured-out-my-personality-type/</link>
	<description>I'm ALWAYS going the Wong way</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 14:16:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Derek</title>
		<link>http://www.goingthewongway.com/2008/01/23/figured-out-my-personality-type/#comment-8371</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 17:35:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goingthewongway.com/2008/01/23/figured-out-my-personality-type/#comment-8371</guid>
		<description>Do you agree that this might be me?  

The thing is, I don't think that I can even take those tests very well.  I actually got something different when I took the test.  But when I read the description for my test result, it seems very unlike me.  And the INTP does still seem like me.  It's still not exactly pinned down, though.  I was hanging out with Cathy and Emily on Friday night in the lounge, and when Cathy read the INTP description, I was definitely thinking that was a fair description.

In any case, I will perhaps read some of the Keirsey's book.  We shall see.  I'm still curious about what other people might think that I am, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you agree that this might be me?  </p>
<p>The thing is, I don&#8217;t think that I can even take those tests very well.  I actually got something different when I took the test.  But when I read the description for my test result, it seems very unlike me.  And the INTP does still seem like me.  It&#8217;s still not exactly pinned down, though.  I was hanging out with Cathy and Emily on Friday night in the lounge, and when Cathy read the INTP description, I was definitely thinking that was a fair description.</p>
<p>In any case, I will perhaps read some of the Keirsey&#8217;s book.  We shall see.  I&#8217;m still curious about what other people might think that I am, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pretentious rat badger</title>
		<link>http://www.goingthewongway.com/2008/01/23/figured-out-my-personality-type/#comment-8356</link>
		<dc:creator>pretentious rat badger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 06:09:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goingthewongway.com/2008/01/23/figured-out-my-personality-type/#comment-8356</guid>
		<description>LoL. awesome. i'm glad you got a type slightly nailed down. you now join the very elite ranks of the rationals (NTs) of whom there are very few. in fact, i think there are only two other INTPs that i know of - tammy jow and dave yu. :D 

in any case, you should try reading your dad's "please understand me II" book, you might find keirsey's theories and mini-essays interesting and probably a lot more extensive than what's online. even the supplementary material on leadership, parenting, and mating is pretty enlightening. 

but seriously, i love to hear when hard to pin down people such as yourself, find a type that suits you the most. (saves me the trouble of scrutinizing you constantly.)  ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LoL. awesome. i&#8217;m glad you got a type slightly nailed down. you now join the very elite ranks of the rationals (NTs) of whom there are very few. in fact, i think there are only two other INTPs that i know of - tammy jow and dave yu. <img src='http://www.goingthewongway.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>in any case, you should try reading your dad&#8217;s &#8220;please understand me II&#8221; book, you might find keirsey&#8217;s theories and mini-essays interesting and probably a lot more extensive than what&#8217;s online. even the supplementary material on leadership, parenting, and mating is pretty enlightening. </p>
<p>but seriously, i love to hear when hard to pin down people such as yourself, find a type that suits you the most. (saves me the trouble of scrutinizing you constantly.)  <img src='http://www.goingthewongway.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek</title>
		<link>http://www.goingthewongway.com/2008/01/23/figured-out-my-personality-type/#comment-8276</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 00:15:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goingthewongway.com/2008/01/23/figured-out-my-personality-type/#comment-8276</guid>
		<description>Hm yeah I'd tend to think that our core personality doesn't change too much.  However, I know that for me I've gone through quite a bit of change.  I think that's made it even harder for me to figure out who I am at my core.

I wonder if it's true for everyone that they're basically the same as they were in high school.  I can see similarities for myself, but I don't know if I see as much as you see in yourself.  Maybe I need to look harder.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hm yeah I&#8217;d tend to think that our core personality doesn&#8217;t change too much.  However, I know that for me I&#8217;ve gone through quite a bit of change.  I think that&#8217;s made it even harder for me to figure out who I am at my core.</p>
<p>I wonder if it&#8217;s true for everyone that they&#8217;re basically the same as they were in high school.  I can see similarities for myself, but I don&#8217;t know if I see as much as you see in yourself.  Maybe I need to look harder.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ms. Q</title>
		<link>http://www.goingthewongway.com/2008/01/23/figured-out-my-personality-type/#comment-8234</link>
		<dc:creator>Ms. Q</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 03:12:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goingthewongway.com/2008/01/23/figured-out-my-personality-type/#comment-8234</guid>
		<description>It's fun to take the tests and what's been interesting is that for the MBTI I really haven't changed all that much. I may have changed outwardly (I'm more confident) but my core (being methodical, organized, and risk-adverse) hasn't changed at all. I may be more comfortable with spontaneity but I'd rather have planning.

I recently listened to someone speak about interviewing techniques - from an interviewer's side of things. The woman said that one great question to ask was, "How were you in high school?" or something like that. The idea was that our core personality doesn't change much. In my case, this is certainly true. I may be more outgoing now but I worked hard in high school, got along well with others (I was shy but people liked me) and I took measured risks. Still do that to this day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s fun to take the tests and what&#8217;s been interesting is that for the MBTI I really haven&#8217;t changed all that much. I may have changed outwardly (I&#8217;m more confident) but my core (being methodical, organized, and risk-adverse) hasn&#8217;t changed at all. I may be more comfortable with spontaneity but I&#8217;d rather have planning.</p>
<p>I recently listened to someone speak about interviewing techniques - from an interviewer&#8217;s side of things. The woman said that one great question to ask was, &#8220;How were you in high school?&#8221; or something like that. The idea was that our core personality doesn&#8217;t change much. In my case, this is certainly true. I may be more outgoing now but I worked hard in high school, got along well with others (I was shy but people liked me) and I took measured risks. Still do that to this day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jill/Twipply Skwood</title>
		<link>http://www.goingthewongway.com/2008/01/23/figured-out-my-personality-type/#comment-8113</link>
		<dc:creator>Jill/Twipply Skwood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 02:37:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goingthewongway.com/2008/01/23/figured-out-my-personality-type/#comment-8113</guid>
		<description>Yes it was a teacher workshop.  I guess by figuring out our own personality type and those of our students, we are supposed to be better able to adjust our interactions to the kids.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes it was a teacher workshop.  I guess by figuring out our own personality type and those of our students, we are supposed to be better able to adjust our interactions to the kids.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek</title>
		<link>http://www.goingthewongway.com/2008/01/23/figured-out-my-personality-type/#comment-8070</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 06:44:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goingthewongway.com/2008/01/23/figured-out-my-personality-type/#comment-8070</guid>
		<description>I've never heard of that particular color test, but it sounds pretty interesting.  Initially when I was reading about it in your comment it reminded me of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Four_Temperaments, but it doesn't quite sound the same after all.  That Four Temperament test is the one that I've had the most experience with.

I'd tend to agree that people can't be completely enclosed within a particular type, but they rather have different parts of all possible types.  Usually there is a particular tendency, though, and that is what these tests want to show.

Was this workshop for teachers or what?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve never heard of that particular color test, but it sounds pretty interesting.  Initially when I was reading about it in your comment it reminded me of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Four_Temperaments" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Four_Temperaments</a>, but it doesn&#8217;t quite sound the same after all.  That Four Temperament test is the one that I&#8217;ve had the most experience with.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d tend to agree that people can&#8217;t be completely enclosed within a particular type, but they rather have different parts of all possible types.  Usually there is a particular tendency, though, and that is what these tests want to show.</p>
<p>Was this workshop for teachers or what?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek</title>
		<link>http://www.goingthewongway.com/2008/01/23/figured-out-my-personality-type/#comment-8066</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 05:30:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goingthewongway.com/2008/01/23/figured-out-my-personality-type/#comment-8066</guid>
		<description>Oh well that's good that the results didn't change too much for you!  Were you always very interested in these types of things?

Hm I'm not sure if this will be my first time taking this test.  I've definitely taken other tests before, though.  In any case, I'm hoping to take the test one day this week.  We can also analyze your personality!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh well that&#8217;s good that the results didn&#8217;t change too much for you!  Were you always very interested in these types of things?</p>
<p>Hm I&#8217;m not sure if this will be my first time taking this test.  I&#8217;ve definitely taken other tests before, though.  In any case, I&#8217;m hoping to take the test one day this week.  We can also analyze your personality!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jill/Twipply Skwood</title>
		<link>http://www.goingthewongway.com/2008/01/23/figured-out-my-personality-type/#comment-8029</link>
		<dc:creator>Jill/Twipply Skwood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 12:12:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goingthewongway.com/2008/01/23/figured-out-my-personality-type/#comment-8029</guid>
		<description>Well we did one at a workshop at school that seemed to explain something that had been confusing me for years.  It was a color one - blue meant a person who most pays attention to feelings and relationships, green was a person who payed attention to logic and inquisitiveness, orange was sort of like fun loving and out there no rules, and gold was methodical, rule following type of thing.  The confusing thing to me was that people *always* tell me I'm so easygoing and flexible.  And I think of myself as sort of obsessive compulsive and inflexible - the opposite.  So when you take these tests you get a score for each color.  I got pretty much equal for the blue and green, then my next highest was orange and then gold was last.  So the woman that led it said that the color that came in last was generally was their personality trait that they turn to in times of stress.  That made total sense to me, because it's when I'm stressed out that I turn to list making and triple checking everything - obsessive compulsive stuff.  

I don't mean I fell in love with the test or anything, but there were certain things about it that were interesting.  I mean, I already knew a lot of what I "found out" about myself.  But the neat idea was that of the four types of personalities, you end up with a little of everything but just in order of how *much* you have them.  So it's not like you're in an either/or thing.  She says that you pull up different parts of your personality when you need them.  And sort of the point of the knowing it I think is recognizing that the colors where you scored the highest are going to be easiest for you to operate in, that you might have to work harder to operate in a personality trait that you scored less in but that you do it when  you need to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well we did one at a workshop at school that seemed to explain something that had been confusing me for years.  It was a color one - blue meant a person who most pays attention to feelings and relationships, green was a person who payed attention to logic and inquisitiveness, orange was sort of like fun loving and out there no rules, and gold was methodical, rule following type of thing.  The confusing thing to me was that people *always* tell me I&#8217;m so easygoing and flexible.  And I think of myself as sort of obsessive compulsive and inflexible - the opposite.  So when you take these tests you get a score for each color.  I got pretty much equal for the blue and green, then my next highest was orange and then gold was last.  So the woman that led it said that the color that came in last was generally was their personality trait that they turn to in times of stress.  That made total sense to me, because it&#8217;s when I&#8217;m stressed out that I turn to list making and triple checking everything - obsessive compulsive stuff.  </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t mean I fell in love with the test or anything, but there were certain things about it that were interesting.  I mean, I already knew a lot of what I &#8220;found out&#8221; about myself.  But the neat idea was that of the four types of personalities, you end up with a little of everything but just in order of how *much* you have them.  So it&#8217;s not like you&#8217;re in an either/or thing.  She says that you pull up different parts of your personality when you need them.  And sort of the point of the knowing it I think is recognizing that the colors where you scored the highest are going to be easiest for you to operate in, that you might have to work harder to operate in a personality trait that you scored less in but that you do it when  you need to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emily</title>
		<link>http://www.goingthewongway.com/2008/01/23/figured-out-my-personality-type/#comment-8024</link>
		<dc:creator>Emily</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 05:14:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goingthewongway.com/2008/01/23/figured-out-my-personality-type/#comment-8024</guid>
		<description>I took the test like 2nd year in college, took it again, and then again last year maybe? I don't remember but it pretty much stays the same except my degree of introvertedness changes a little b/c I'm close to borderline.  It makes sense that it wouldn't change much because personality is a relatively stable trait.  I guess you can say that I do think it's accurate but of course only to a certain extent since I am a complex individual.  haha.  =P Anyways, will this be your first time taking the test?  I will bring the kiersey book on Friday so we can analyze your personality.  haha.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I took the test like 2nd year in college, took it again, and then again last year maybe? I don&#8217;t remember but it pretty much stays the same except my degree of introvertedness changes a little b/c I&#8217;m close to borderline.  It makes sense that it wouldn&#8217;t change much because personality is a relatively stable trait.  I guess you can say that I do think it&#8217;s accurate but of course only to a certain extent since I am a complex individual.  haha.  =P Anyways, will this be your first time taking the test?  I will bring the kiersey book on Friday so we can analyze your personality.  haha.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek</title>
		<link>http://www.goingthewongway.com/2008/01/23/figured-out-my-personality-type/#comment-8023</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 04:05:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goingthewongway.com/2008/01/23/figured-out-my-personality-type/#comment-8023</guid>
		<description>I appreciate your views as I'm sure that you have much more experience in the area than I do!  In truth, I probably see personality tests in the same light.  They're good, up to a point.  But I always have to remember their place.  I think that I also have not really liked them in general because I feel that they don't take into account so much.  Perhaps I'm starting to see their worth.  In any case, thanks for your comment!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I appreciate your views as I&#8217;m sure that you have much more experience in the area than I do!  In truth, I probably see personality tests in the same light.  They&#8217;re good, up to a point.  But I always have to remember their place.  I think that I also have not really liked them in general because I feel that they don&#8217;t take into account so much.  Perhaps I&#8217;m starting to see their worth.  In any case, thanks for your comment!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
