<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Going The Wong Way &#187; Geek</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.goingthewongway.com/tag/geek/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.goingthewongway.com</link>
	<description>I&#039;m ALWAYS going the Wong way</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 07:19:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Public Restrooms Are Scary</title>
		<link>http://www.goingthewongway.com/736/public-restrooms-are-scary/</link>
		<comments>http://www.goingthewongway.com/736/public-restrooms-are-scary/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 19:16:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Derek</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nerd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amusing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[life in code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Python]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Useful]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goingthewongway.com/?p=736</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[# use_public_toilet.py # # Algorithm for using a public toilet. Success will vary based on the # toilet/situation (obviously). However, this seems to be a generally safe # way to approach using a toilet. # # Handles both male and female needs as well as exceptional cases such as # no available toilet, getting dirty, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<pre>
<span style="color: green; font-style: italic"># use_public_toilet.py
#
# Algorithm for using a public toilet.  Success will vary based on the
# toilet/situation (obviously).  However, this seems to be a generally safe
# way to approach using a toilet.
#
# Handles both male and female needs as well as exceptional cases such as
# no available toilet, getting dirty, and entering the wrong gender's
# bathroom.
#
# Algorithm is roughly:
# 1) Enter bathroom
# 2) Find suitable toilet
# 3) Protect yourself if it's a stall toilet that you sit on
# 4) Do your business
# 5) Finish up

</span><span style="color: blue; font-weight: bold">import </span>common_sense

<span style="color: green; font-style: italic"># Sometimes even nature's calling cannot overrule common sense
# Including when you walk into the wrong bathroom
</span><span style="color: blue; font-weight: bold">if </span><span style="font-weight: bold">(</span>bathroom<span style="font-weight: bold">.</span>is_disgusting <span style="color: blue; font-weight: bold">or </span>bathroom<span style="font-weight: bold">.</span>is_dangerous
    <span style="color: blue; font-weight: bold">or </span>bathroom<span style="font-weight: bold">.</span>gender <span style="font-weight: bold">!= </span>you<span style="font-weight: bold">.</span>gender<span style="font-weight: bold">):
    </span>you<span style="font-weight: bold">.</span>hold<span style="font-weight: bold">(</span><span style="color: red">'your waste'</span><span style="font-weight: bold">)
    </span><span style="color: blue; font-weight: bold">return </span><span style="color: green; font-style: italic"># (i.e., get out of there!)

</span>my_toilet <span style="font-weight: bold">= </span><span style="color: blue">None
</span><span style="color: green; font-style: italic"># Only male urinaters get to use the urinals, at least in the common case
# (Abnormal cases are unhandled here)
</span><span style="color: blue; font-weight: bold">if </span>you<span style="font-weight: bold">.</span>need<span style="font-weight: bold">() == </span><span style="color: red">'urinate' </span><span style="color: blue; font-weight: bold">and </span>you<span style="font-weight: bold">.</span>gender <span style="font-weight: bold">== </span><span style="color: red">'male'</span><span style="font-weight: bold">:
    </span><span style="color: blue; font-weight: bold">for </span>urinal <span style="color: blue; font-weight: bold">in </span>bathroom<span style="font-weight: bold">.</span>urinals<span style="font-weight: bold">:
        </span><span style="color: blue; font-weight: bold">if not </span>urinal<span style="font-weight: bold">.</span>empty<span style="font-weight: bold">:
            </span><span style="color: blue; font-weight: bold">continue
        </span>my_toilet <span style="font-weight: bold">= </span>urinal

<span style="color: green; font-style: italic"># If you are not a male urinating or there is no urinal available
</span><span style="color: blue; font-weight: bold">if </span>my_toilet <span style="color: blue; font-weight: bold">is </span><span style="color: blue">None</span><span style="font-weight: bold">:
    </span><span style="color: green; font-style: italic"># Time to look for the stall
    </span><span style="color: blue; font-weight: bold">for </span>stall <span style="color: blue; font-weight: bold">in </span>bathroom<span style="font-weight: bold">.</span>stalls<span style="font-weight: bold">:
        </span><span style="color: green; font-style: italic"># Use an empty toilet that can also be initialized to a clean state
        </span><span style="color: blue; font-weight: bold">if not </span>stall<span style="font-weight: bold">.</span>empty <span style="color: blue; font-weight: bold">or </span><span style="font-weight: bold">(</span><span style="color: blue; font-weight: bold">not </span>toilet<span style="font-weight: bold">.</span>clean <span style="color: blue; font-weight: bold">and not </span>toilet<span style="font-weight: bold">.</span>works<span style="font-weight: bold">):
            </span><span style="color: blue; font-weight: bold">continue
        </span>you<span style="font-weight: bold">.</span>enter<span style="font-weight: bold">(</span><span style="color: red">'Stall %s' </span><span style="font-weight: bold">% </span>stall<span style="font-weight: bold">)
        </span>my_toilet <span style="font-weight: bold">= </span>stall
        <span style="color: blue; font-weight: bold">break
    else</span><span style="font-weight: bold">:
        </span><span style="color: green; font-style: italic"># You could not find a suitable stall to use
        </span><span style="color: blue; font-weight: bold">return

    </span>you<span style="font-weight: bold">.</span>wipe<span style="font-weight: bold">(</span><span style="color: red">'toilet seat'</span><span style="font-weight: bold">)
    </span>you<span style="font-weight: bold">.</span>put<span style="font-weight: bold">(</span><span style="color: red">'toilet seat cover'</span><span style="font-weight: bold">)
    </span><span style="color: blue; font-weight: bold">while not </span>toilet<span style="font-weight: bold">.</span>seat_covered<span style="font-weight: bold">():
        </span>you<span style="font-weight: bold">.</span>put<span style="font-weight: bold">(</span><span style="color: red">'toilet paper'</span><span style="font-weight: bold">)

</span><span style="color: green; font-style: italic"># Finally the time has come to get down to business
</span><span style="color: blue; font-weight: bold">try</span><span style="font-weight: bold">:
    </span>you<span style="font-weight: bold">.</span>sit<span style="font-weight: bold">()
    </span>you<span style="font-weight: bold">.</span>do_your_business<span style="font-weight: bold">()
</span><span style="color: blue; font-weight: bold">except </span>TouchDirtyException<span style="font-weight: bold">:   </span><span style="color: green; font-style: italic"># Don't touch the toilet!
    </span>you<span style="font-weight: bold">.</span>cry<span style="font-weight: bold">()

</span>you<span style="font-weight: bold">.</span>flush<span style="font-weight: bold">(</span>my_toilet<span style="font-weight: bold">)
</span>you<span style="font-weight: bold">.</span>wash_hands<span style="font-weight: bold">()
</span>you<span style="font-weight: bold">.</span>leave<span style="font-weight: bold">()
</span><span style="color: blue; font-weight: bold">if </span>you<span style="font-weight: bold">.</span>satisfied<span style="font-weight: bold">:             </span><span style="color: green; font-style: italic"># Be happy, you're done
    </span>you<span style="font-weight: bold">.</span>smile<span style="font-weight: bold">()

</span>
</pre>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.goingthewongway.com/736/public-restrooms-are-scary/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Understanding Domains</title>
		<link>http://www.goingthewongway.com/424/understanding-domains/</link>
		<comments>http://www.goingthewongway.com/424/understanding-domains/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 07:12:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Derek</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nerd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seen-Around]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goingthewongway.com/?p=424</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If I could have your attention, I would rather like to quickly rant about something that I see all of the time. People pay for their own domain name Those same people want to get e-mail Those people proceed to register an e-mail address with some free webmail (e.g., Yahoo!, Google, etc) Why does require [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I could have your attention, I would rather like to quickly rant about something that I see all of the time.</p>
<ol>
<li>People pay for their own domain name</li>
<li>Those same people want to get e-mail</li>
<li>Those people proceed to register an e-mail address with some free webmail (e.g., Yahoo!, Google, etc)</li>
</ol>
<p>Why does require a rant?  Because they paid for their own domain!  Instead of having to register SomeOrganizationSomeGroup@gmail.com, they could very well just decide that they want to get SomeGroup@TheirDomain.com.  Doesn&#8217;t that seem more appealing?  Isn&#8217;t that more professional and more enjoyable?  Yes, yes I think that we can all agree to that.  </p>
<p>The only argument that I can think of is that people want to be able to use the webmail clients to access their e-mail.  I hear ya.  But maybe more importantly, Google hears ya.  I don&#8217;t want to be a Google salesman, but their <a href="http://www.google.com/apps/intl/en/group/index.html">standard edition of Google Apps</a> is pretty free.  And that will pretty much take care of you.</p>
<p>Together, we can combat annoying-to-remember e-mail addresses.  We can do it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.goingthewongway.com/424/understanding-domains/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tough To Say Whether It&#8217;s Even Decent</title>
		<link>http://www.goingthewongway.com/609/tough-to-say-whether-its-even-decent/</link>
		<comments>http://www.goingthewongway.com/609/tough-to-say-whether-its-even-decent/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 07:20:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Derek</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nerd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goingthewongway.com/?p=609</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have been working on a budgeting application called Budse (actually for quite some time now). It&#8217;s a straight forward application that allows you to create a set of accounts that have rules assigned to them, which dictate how to split up whole account deposits (e.g., a paycheck). I originally had the idea because I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been working on a budgeting application called <a href="http://budse.sourceforge.net/">Budse</a> (actually for quite some time now).  It&#8217;s a straight forward application that allows you to create a set of accounts that have rules assigned to them, which dictate how to split up whole account deposits (e.g., a paycheck).  I originally had the idea because I wanted to start budgeting using the <a href="http://www.goingthewongway.com/199/is-the-40-30-20-10-rule-too-ideal/">40-30-20-10 rule</a>.  But then I realized that I wanted to use the idea but customize it a little bit more for my needs.</p>
<p>But enough about the details.  On to my point.</p>
<p>So I am working on Budse by myself.  I started the project, and it has been a one-man show the whole time.  As an individual developer working on an open source project, sometimes I dream.  I start to think big about people actually using it.  Big dreams, I know.  Haha currently I doubt it if anyone aside from me uses it.  When I was coding and especially when I was deciding on how to license it, I thought that since it fulfilled my need it would be useful to other people as well.  Maybe that&#8217;s not true.  Maybe it is.  It remains to be seen.</p>
<p>It is so easy to dream of becoming great.  But maybe dreaming big isn&#8217;t such a bad thing.  Maybe if I lost the ability to dream big, I would lose a little bit of who I am.  So while I am currently unsatisfied with its use, I am definitely going to press forward!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.goingthewongway.com/609/tough-to-say-whether-its-even-decent/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Changing Permalinks</title>
		<link>http://www.goingthewongway.com/574/changing-permalinks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.goingthewongway.com/574/changing-permalinks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 17:30:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Derek</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wordpress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goingthewongway.com/?p=574</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oh boy that was sweet. Okay let me qualify that by saying that I enjoy when things are easy and efficient. If you feel differently, then you may very well disagree with me. So on a nice lazy morning I decided to look into converting my permalink structure to one that I preferred. Permalinks are [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh boy that was sweet.  Okay let me qualify that by saying that I enjoy when things are easy and efficient.  If you feel differently, then you may very well disagree with me.</p>
<p>So on a nice lazy morning I decided to look into converting my permalink structure to one that I preferred.  Permalinks are how WordPress describes permanent links to a post.  When I first started this blog a couple of years ago (seriously, that long??) I decided on going with a fairly standard /yyyy/mm/dd/post-name type of structure for my posts.  However, I am now a little opposed to this since it reveals more information than I would like.  I tend to think that my writing transcends time since I am not usually writing about current events so I want to remove a visitor&#8217;s perception that my post is not worth reading just because it is old.</p>
<p>After searching online, I came upon Scott Yang&#8217;s <a href="http://scott.yang.id.au/code/permalink-redirect/">Permalink Redirect plugin</a>.  The instructions seemed easy enough so I:</p>
<ol>
<li>Downloaded it</li>
<li>Unzipped, installed, and activated it</li>
<li>Accessed the new Settings->Permalink Redirect page.  Under &#8220;Old Permalink Structure&#8221; clicked the link after &#8220;Current permalink structure&#8221;</li>
<li>Accessed Settings->Permalinks.  Changed to a /post-id/post-name structure.  (I used tags that I found <a href="http://codex.wordpress.org/Using_Permalinks#Structure_Tags">here</a>.)</li>
</ol>
<p>All of my old links are now redirecting correctly!  And that, my friends and enemies, is sweet!  Especially since it took less time than it has taken me to write this post.  I&#8217;m loving <a href="http://wordpress.org/">WordPress</a> all over again for its abilities, both built-in and extensible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.goingthewongway.com/574/changing-permalinks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Go, Go, Stop!</title>
		<link>http://www.goingthewongway.com/485/go-go-stop/</link>
		<comments>http://www.goingthewongway.com/485/go-go-stop/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 08:06:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Derek</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nerd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seen-Around]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goingthewongway.com/?p=485</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I often like to think about things that I take for granted. It makes me more appreciative of what I have, and I don&#8217;t think that&#8217;s a bad thing at all. A while back, I was thinking about how great the yellow light is. For me, more often than not it&#8217;s a sign that says, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I often like to think about things that I take for granted.  It makes me more appreciative of what I have, and I don&#8217;t think that&#8217;s a bad thing at all.  A while back, I was thinking about how great the yellow light is.  For me, more often than not it&#8217;s a sign that says, &#8220;figure out if you can make this light!&#8221;  Sometimes this is a resounding yes, and sometimes it&#8217;s a resounding no.  Sometimes it&#8217;s even &#8220;you better get going pronto!&#8221;  Can you imagine, though, what it would be like without yellow lights?  Drivers would be moseying along thinking that they&#8217;re good to go, when all of a sudden they need to slam on their brakes.  Accidents would abound because brakes cannot stop you instantly.</p>
<p>Recently, I even got to experience a similar kind of fun.  Many of the lights along a street that I commute on were out.  So as expected all of the cars treated each malfunctioning light as an all-way stop intersection.  And that wrecked havoc on my commute.  Boy am I glad for signals!</p>
<p>Oddly enough, this reminded me of a problem that I am dealing with at work.  The problem is that I am trying to make a single database access for every single object that I want to create.  That would be analogous to a stop sign which lets everyone through one at a time.  Ideally I am trying to code things that will allow for multiple objects with a single database connection.  This would be with the lights that let multiple cars through.  I do enjoy finding out how <a href="http://www.goingthewongway.com/2007/08/21/how-good-programming-practices-help-in-real-life/">good software practices relate to life</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.goingthewongway.com/485/go-go-stop/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>xkcd: Imposter</title>
		<link>http://www.goingthewongway.com/280/xkcd-imposter/</link>
		<comments>http://www.goingthewongway.com/280/xkcd-imposter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 17:17:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Derek</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[xkcd]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goingthewongway.com/?p=280</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://xkcd.com">xkcd</a> is a webcomic that I know and love.  It has all sorts of amusing thoughts on life (with a touch of geekiness).
...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://xkcd.com">xkcd</a> is a webcomic that I know and love.  It has all sorts of amusing thoughts on life (with a touch of geekiness).</p>
<p>Anyway, I found today&#8217;s post (<a href="http://xkcd.com/451/">Imposter</a>) rather amusing, and I thought that I would share:</p>
<p><img src="http://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/impostor.png" title="If you think this is too hard on literary criticism, read the Wikipedia article on deconstruction." alt="Impostor" /></p>
<p><b>Bonus: make sure you hover over the picture in order to get the punchline.  It&#8217;s saved in the &#8220;title&#8221; portion of the tag.</b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.goingthewongway.com/280/xkcd-imposter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>TiddlyWiki For The World!</title>
		<link>http://www.goingthewongway.com/249/tiddlywiki-for-the-world/</link>
		<comments>http://www.goingthewongway.com/249/tiddlywiki-for-the-world/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 07:10:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Derek</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nerd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Useful]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goingthewongway.com/?p=249</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You might have heard of a wiki.  Then again, you also might not have heard one it.  It's a method of displaying user-modifiable content.  That is, it can be changed by the people looking at it.  This is different than things like this blog where I and I alone get to write.  The wiki has been gaining notoriety since it allows the collaboration of knowledge, especially over the Internet.  

The name wiki gets its name from Ward Cunningham, developer of the very first wiki.  It's actually Hawaiian in origin (wiki means fast), but you can read more about that at Wikipedia's (appropriate since it's one of the most well known wikis) <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wiki">page on the wiki</a>.

...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You might have heard of a wiki.  Then again, you also might not have heard one it.  It&#8217;s a method of displaying user-modifiable content.  That is, it can be changed by the people looking at it.  This is different than things like this blog where I and I alone get to write.  The wiki has been gaining notoriety since it allows the collaboration of knowledge, especially over the Internet.  </p>
<p>The name wiki gets its name from Ward Cunningham, developer of the very first wiki.  It&#8217;s actually Hawaiian in origin (wiki means fast), but you can read more about that at Wikipedia&#8217;s (appropriate since it&#8217;s one of the most well known wikis) <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wiki">page on the wiki</a>.</p>
<h4>The TiddlyWiki</h4>
<p>So now that we&#8217;ve got the foundation knowledge in place, I wanted to share about the <a href="http://www.tiddlywiki.com">TiddlyWiki</a>.  (It still strikes me as an amusing name.)  It is touted as a personal non-linear personal web notebook.  I like to think of it as a central place where you can store whatever you want.  It&#8217;s pretty easy to use after some initial adjustment.  It is a single <abbr title="Hyper Text Markup Language">html</abbr> file just like any old webpage.  </p>
<p>To use it just open it up in any web browser, and you&#8217;re ready to go.  Double-click on things to change them, and you can start creating new tiddlers (entries) and deleting ones that you don&#8217;t need.  Saving your changes saves the information into that exact same html file.  So all of the data <b>and</b> the framework are contained within a single file.  As long as you have a web browser, you can modify your file.  And what computer out there doesn&#8217;t have some sort of a web browser nowadays?</p>
<p>This file is the perfect size for a portable <abbr title="Universal Serial Bus">usb</abbr><abbr> drive.  It starts off empty at about 250KB, but it doesn&#8217;t grow all that quickly since only the new text that is added is stored.</p>
<p>The TiddlyWiki is a method that is open to different uses.  And there are many.</p>
<h4>Some uses for TiddlyWiki</h4>
<ul>
<li>Web Journal &#8211; save links and articles that you find online</li>
<li>Blog &#8211; extremely easy to write and publish (just put the html file on a web server and it&#8217;s published)</li>
<li>Personal Journal &#8211; just have the file with you wherever you are, and it&#8217;ll be safe from prying eyes</li>
<li>Collaborate on projects &#8211; one person can write and the changes will be instantly available for anyone else to see</li>
</ul>
<p>There are many ways to store information.  You could write it on paper, you could just remember everything, you could use a Microsoft Word document, whatever.  So here are some reasons why you&#8217;d use a TiddlyWiki instead of one of those other methods.</p>
<h4>Advantages of TiddlyWiki</h4>
<ul>
<li>Basic tags (which allow you to quickly see all entries with a particular tag)</li>
<li>Quick searching as you type into the search box</li>
<li>Self-contained (it&#8217;s a single file)</li>
<li>Portable (I guess that&#8217;s always relative, but it&#8217;s small in size)</li>
<li>Interactive feel</li>
</ul>
<h4>Server-side Implementations</h4>
<p>Personally I&#8217;ve been using a version of this that&#8217;s on my server.  I tried a couple of different products, but <a href="http://www.minitiddlyserver.com/">MiniTiddlyServer</a> was the easiest and most straightforward for my PHP-enabled server.  All I needed to do was download the zip file, put it onto my server, and off I went!  <ins datetime="2008-04-16T04:38:20+00:00">Update: Check out <a href="http://goingthewongway.com/tw/">my own TiddlyWiki</a></ins> </p>
<p>For those without their own server, <a href="http://tiddlyspot.com">TiddlySpot</a> seems like a reasonable free solution.</abbr></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.goingthewongway.com/249/tiddlywiki-for-the-world/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Difference Between Nerd, Geek, And Dork</title>
		<link>http://www.goingthewongway.com/208/difference-between-nerd-geek-and-dork/</link>
		<comments>http://www.goingthewongway.com/208/difference-between-nerd-geek-and-dork/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 17:42:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Derek</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nerd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amusing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seen-Around]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goingthewongway.com/2008/02/15/difference-between-nerd-geek-and-dork/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The common thought is that nerds, geeks, and dorks are one and the same.  However, I don't think so.  Semantics, shemantics, you say.
...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The common thought is that nerds, geeks, and dorks are one and the same.  However, I don&#8217;t think so.  Semantics, shemantics, you say.</p>
<p>Although they seem very similar, I&#8217;m gonna have to go with a &#8220;yeah I don&#8217;t think so.&#8221;  Looking them up online doesn&#8217;t provide definitive results, but I am still convinced.  (Looking them up online does prove amusing because apparently the first definition of <a href="http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=nerd&#038;db=*">nerd</a> is &#8220;a stupid, irritating, ineffectual, or unattractive person.&#8221;  Stinks to be called unattractive in the dictionary.)</p>
<p>First off, the most important thing to note with any of these terms is that they can have both negative and positive connotations.  I think that it mainly depends on your self-awareness.  So if someone calls you a nerd, and you think of yourself as a nerd, then it&#8217;s not so bad.  However, if you think that you&#8217;re a cool guy and you get called a nerd, all is not right with the world.  As in many things in life, the failing of some expectation will result in your disappointment.  And sadness.  And low self-esteem.  You get the point.</p>
<p>Alright so back to the matter at hand.  (Hm I thought there was a rap song with &#8220;back to the matter at hand,&#8221; but I can&#8217;t find the song, let alone one that I could listen to in order to verify that.  So&#8230;you get a small lame comment about how I tried and failed to remember a rap song of old.)  Okay back to it, really now.</p>
<p>Here is the breakdown of the different types (at least in my mind):</p>
<ul>
<li><b>Nerd &#8211; intelligent, industrious, understands things</b>
<div class="alignright" style="float:right; margin-left: 20px;">
<img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2261/2263814806_705169093b_o.jpg" width="240" height="188" alt="computer programming" /><em>Courtesy of Flickr user <a href="http://flickr.com/photos/mjryall/">Matt Ryall</a></em></div>
<p>By day I&#8217;m a software engineer.  (By night a superhero, but that&#8217;s another matter.)  So I&#8217;m obviously a little biased if I give a good definition for a word and also remind everyone that it can describe me.  But whatever, it&#8217;s what I actually think.</p>
<p>Some computer programmers (but by no means all of them) generally tend to be of the sort of people that want to delve deeper into understanding issues than others would.  They want to truly understand how something works rather than just settling for using the end product.  In the case of computer programming, while everyone else is content with looking at websites, using applications, and generally enjoying the products of the computer programming, the programmers themselves are working to create those products.  And if they&#8217;re not creating them, then they&#8217;re trying to understand them.</p>
<p>Some of them might not be like that, but those are the kind that will end up not being very good at what they do.  Those are the ones that do not have <a href="http://www.goingthewongway.com/2007/02/28/professional-integrity/">Professional Integrity</a>.  They&#8217;ll also end up being your boss, but more on that later.  </p>
<p>In a general sense, nerds can be from all different backgrounds.  But I think that they can generally be described as someone who is willing to study and do the work in order to learn the stuff.  I&#8217;m not quite sure that someone who is naturally gifted with intelligence but who doesn&#8217;t utilize it can be categorized as a nerd.  No, I take that back.  They cannot be categorized as a nerd.  They&#8217;re just smart and lazy.  Really, how much worse can you get?  I think that most people would rather be dumb and hard-working than smart and lazy.</p>
<div class="alignright" style="float:right; margin-left: 20px;">
<img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2042/2263025755_b6b8488e2f_o.jpg" width="240" height="169" alt="studying" /><em>Courtesy of Flickr user <a href="http://flickr.com/photos/sveinhal/">Pragmagraphr</a></em></div>
<p>Nerds can often be found in libraries, hunched over books, or wondering aloud about their surroundings.  &#8220;Nerd&#8221; seems to be used most often in a complimentary way when describing others.  </p>
<p>Someone can very well be a nerd, and you wouldn&#8217;t be able to tell from the outside appearance.  The stereotype of the nerd is a skinny guy with glasses and a pocket protector.  But something that I learned in college is that the surfer dude can be just as much of a nerd as the stereotype.  He just hides it better.  Much better.</p>
<p>The unfortunately sad thing about the term nerd is that it doesn&#8217;t just apply to those that work hard.  They actually have to be good at whatever it is that they&#8217;re doing, whether school or work.  Someone that works hard but who still is not as successful is just that, a hard worker.  (Of course, a hard worker is <em>still</em> better than a smart lazy person.)</p>
<p>Basically, nerds rule.  They&#8217;re even better when they know that they&#8217;re nerds and are not socially inept.
</li>
<li><b>Geek &#8211; Interested in things that others are not interested in, know a lot about their interests, but usually do not understand underlying principles</b>
<p>So I mentioned before when talking about nerds that there are computer programmers who will end up not being very good at programming.  Unlike the more kindly description that I have above about nerdy computer programmers, these geek programmers fall into another category.  And yeah, that category is lower.</p>
<div class="alignright" style="float:right; margin-left: 20px;">
<img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2084/2263025783_bf718f63e3_o.jpg" width="240" height="180" alt="star trek" /><em>Courtesy of Flickr user <a href="http://flickr.com/photos/clausmorell/">ClausM</a></em></div>
<p>In their work they will do things that they have no idea the meaning of.  Unfortunately, they will sometimes correctly stab in the dark and get something right.  That will only reinforce their thinking that their way is working.  Stumbling, somehow they manage to get others to help them so that they eventually finish whatever it is that they&#8217;re doing.</p>
<p>I generally liken geeks more to IT (Information Technology) type of people rather than computer programmers.  These are the people that know how to use a computer very well, but who would not be able to program &#8220;Hello World.&#8221;  They can fiddle with and modify settings and properties to no end.  They love computers, but they don&#8217;t actually know how a computer works.  Of course, not all IT folks are like this.  In my experience, it just seems like they can more generally be described this way.</p>
<p>Even beyond the IT people, geeks can be interested in a wide spectrum of topics.  They will often be interested in technology-related things.  I think that it&#8217;s because not everyone understands these things.  Since geeks do not have skills in some areas of life, they want to have an area of expertise where others could not compare to them.</p>
<p>So yes, geeks are the types of people that are not only interested in Star Trek, but who will also dress up to go to the premiere.  They&#8217;ll also buy collector cards, read forums online, and read every single book about Star Trek.  Obsess much?  Yes they will.  But you don&#8217;t know where the Klingon Galaxy is located relative to our current position in space, do you??</p>
<p>Geeks come in all shapes and sizes.  Of course, those are usually the odd shapes and sizes.  They are generally not as hard to spot as the nerds because of their disregard for what others think of them.  Their clothes don&#8217;t match, and they might occasionally offend others with their insufficient personal hygiene.</p>
<p>Still, geeks have their strong points.  They are dedicated to what they like.  They don&#8217;t really care that much what other people think about them.  And they generally rule the Internet.  However, they don&#8217;t rule sports, social situations, or tangible environments.  They&#8217;re awkward in situations that they&#8217;re not accustomed to (like the aforementioned) and tend to do things that give away their geekdom like go on incessantly about their favorite topic when the real topic is something entirely different.
</li>
<li><b>Dork &#8211; Foolish, stupid, clumsy</b>
<p>There&#8217;s not really any two-ways about it, &#8220;dork&#8221; is not too good of a term.  Obviously if someone is using it in an endearing fashion, it&#8217;s not too bad.  And if someone says it about themselves, it&#8217;s usually in an amusing and self-deprecating way.  But the term itself doesn&#8217;t have too much positive spin on it.</p>
<div class="alignright" style="float:right; margin-left: 20px;">
<img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2374/2263963848_a332a98b72_o.jpg" width="240" height="180" alt="dork" /><em>Courtesy of Flickr user <a href="http://flickr.com/photos/crankymediaguy/">Cranky Media Guy</a></em></div>
<p>Dorks are the type of people who will do silly things.  That&#8217;s not to say that they&#8217;ll necessarily be the ones making grand gestures to make people laugh.  But they are comfortable enough with themselves to do things like put a &#8220;dork&#8221; box on their head and laugh at themselves.</p>
<p>If the dork is aware that they are a dork, then it&#8217;s funny.  If they&#8217;re not aware, then it&#8217;s painful to watch such a socially uncomfortable person try to get by.  Now I&#8217;m not sure whether they feel awkward or if they feel at ease with themselves in those situations.  All I know is that it&#8217;s sometimes hard for me to watch.</p>
<p>Once again, there are good traits in the dork.  The self-aware dork is able to not take themselves too seriously.  They are able to do what they want without caring about others&#8217; opinions.  And even the dork who is not self-aware is able to make others feel more comfortable simply because of their silliness.  Nobody feels the fool when they&#8217;re next to someone who is more foolish.
</li>
</ul>
<p>The funny thing is, <b>I&#8217;m all of these things.</b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.goingthewongway.com/208/difference-between-nerd-geek-and-dork/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>33</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Partition Your Hard Drive</title>
		<link>http://www.goingthewongway.com/218/partition-your-hard-drive/</link>
		<comments>http://www.goingthewongway.com/218/partition-your-hard-drive/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 18:20:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Derek</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nerd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Learn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goingthewongway.com/2007/10/25/partition-your-hard-drive/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hard drives consist of many bits, configured in a particular way (of which the explanation is far far beyond the scope of this blog post).  But needless to say we like to view the hard drive as a block of space that we can store things in.  The hard drives each have partitions setup on them, the most common case being a single partition for the operating system and all of the data.
...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hard drives consist of many bits, configured in a particular way (of which the explanation is far far beyond the scope of this blog post).  But needless to say we like to view the hard drive as a block of space that we can store things in.  The hard drives each have partitions setup on them, the most common case being a single partition for the operating system and all of the data.</p>
<p>However this is not exactly what a lot of people want.  Sometimes they want different partitions because they want different operating systems on the same computer, but more often it&#8217;s just because they want some kind of division between their data and their operating system, applications, etc.  For more reasons, check out <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Partition_(computing)#Purpose">the purpose of partitioning</a> according to wikipedia.</p>
<p>When you install an operating system for the first time, it has a partitioning tool that allows you to choose how you want to partition your new hard drive.  Well often if you buy your computer retail then they&#8217;ve already set it up for you.  But <em>if</em> you were to actually go through the entire process yourself, then you&#8217;d likely partition the hard drive with the operating system installer&#8217;s tool.</p>
<p>But then, what if your hard drive is currently set up differently than you want?  What do you do once your data is all over your drive?  Well you have a couple of choices.  You can either completely format (and erase) your hard drive and start from scratch.  This is obviously not going to be your first choice if you have data on your hard drive already as that would involve backing up and restoring all of your data.  That seems like a rather long process unless you&#8217;re having serious errors and really do want to start from scratch (which is sometimes the desired outcome).  So the other option is to use some software to re-partition your hard drive while maintaining your data.</p>
<h4>Norton PartitionMagic Replacement</h4>
<p>Many people know about Norton PartitionMagic in order to do exactly this task.  But after eschewing that (in my mind) expensive software, I would highly encourage everyone to check out the free and open source <a href="http://partedmagic.com/">Parted Magic</a>.  That is what I used!  It&#8217;s a LiveCD (which means that you download it, burn it on a cd, insert it into your computer, and boot off the CD.  It utilizes the <a href="http://gparted.sourceforge.net/index.php">Gparted</a> application for the partitioning duties.</p>
<p>It was a snap to use when I recently upgrade my <a href="http://www.ubuntu.com/">Ubuntu</a> installation from Feisty Fawn (7.04) to Gutsy Gibbon (7.10) (don&#8217;t you love the alliterative names, I know that I do).</p>
<p>In order to use just:</p>
<ol>
<li>Defrag your hard drive</li>
<li>Download <a href="http://dw.com.com/redir?edId=3&#038;siteId=4&#038;oId=3000-2094_4-10716910&#038;ontId=2094_4&#038;spi=acdc544bd173f09f9d8c0426e5c554e7&#038;lop=link&#038;tag=tdw_dltext&#038;ltype=dl_dlnow&#038;pid=10716910&#038;mfgId=6292732&#038;merId=6292732&#038;destUrl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.download.com%2F3001-2094_4-10716910.html%3Fspi%3Dacdc544bd173f09f9d8c0426e5c554e7">the .iso image</a></li>
<li>Burn to a CD as a disk image</li>
<li>Insert into computer</li>
<li>Boot to the CD (you might need to change a BIOS setting or two in order to do this)</li>
<li>Create, resize, modify your partitions and keep your data intact!</li>
</ol>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.goingthewongway.com/218/partition-your-hard-drive/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google&#8217;s Taking Over The World&#8230;And I Don&#8217;t Like It</title>
		<link>http://www.goingthewongway.com/216/googles-taking-over-the-worldand-i-dont-like-it/</link>
		<comments>http://www.goingthewongway.com/216/googles-taking-over-the-worldand-i-dont-like-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 23:20:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Derek</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nerd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goingthewongway.com/2007/10/22/googles-taking-over-the-worldand-i-dont-like-it/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With Google increasing the size of Gmail to a bit less than 4 GB last week, I got to thinking about them as a company.  They're ubiquitous to anyone in a developed country because they are the de facto standard for search engines as of today.  And they're good at what they do, they're real good.
...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With Google increasing the size of Gmail to a bit less than 4 GB last week, I got to thinking about them as a company.  They&#8217;re ubiquitous to anyone in a developed country because they are the de facto standard for search engines as of today.  And they&#8217;re good at what they do, they&#8217;re real good.</p>
<p>However they&#8217;re obviously not all knowledgeable or almighty.  They&#8217;re not God.  Although I suppose that they could be a god to some.  Anyways, not everything that they do is superior.  But the fact that there is so much <a href="http://www.goingthewongway.com/2007/01/28/fanaticism/">Fanaticism</a> about Google that you should get an indication that something is up.  And I&#8217;m not down with that.  (Ha&#8230;ha&#8230;I guess that I still get amused by things like <a href="http://www.goingthewongway.com/2007/04/13/up-or-down-same-difference/">Up Or Down, Same Difference</a>.)</p>
<p>Whatever the case, I know that for me they&#8217;re taking over more and more of my Internet profile.  They have my e-mail with Gmail, they are starting to get some of my documents with Google Documents, they have a lot of my searching (although as of late I&#8217;ve been trying to be <a href="http://www.goingthewongway.com/2007/09/28/winning-with-blingo/">Winning With Blingo</a> instead of going directly through Google), search all over the place with Google Maps, and I use Google Reader to peruse my RSS feeds.   <ins datetime="2007-10-24T04:51:33+00:00">Update: I forgot about the obvious Google Analytics, Google AdSense, and the now Google-owned FeedBurner that I use for this blog.</ins>  That&#8217;s a lot of Google products if you ask me.</p>
<p>But even more than the fact that Google is being used so often, they scare me for other reasons.  The fact that they are creating portions where you are required to have a Google login (such as collaborating on documents) is understandable but at the same time rather monopolistic-leaning if you ask me.  I&#8217;d wish that they&#8217;d allow create methods by which to create opportunities for people without having to create Google logins (easy as that may be).  People need/want/love choice.  And some people choose not to have a Google account.  Arguments that they don&#8217;t need to use shared collaboration ignore the fact that they might need to.  And then there are even scarier things like <a href="http://www.goingthewongway.com/2007/05/31/google-web-history/">Google Web History</a> (where they keep track of everything that you access from their site) and impinge on my personal life while also laying down the path to even scarier types of behavior.  </p>
<p>I can see how as they get bigger and try to innovate, they could tread on territory that I&#8217;d much rather they stayed far away from.  Somethings are more important than having perfectly relevant ads or a computer that can predict what you want to know.</p>
<p>Their well-known unofficial motto is &#8220;Don&#8217;t Be Evil,&#8221; I can&#8217;t help but get the feeling that the change of evil increases as corporations do.  And Google is getting to be the big boy on the block.  As big of a proponent as I might be for capitalism at work, that doesn&#8217;t mean that I always need to support the entities involved.  I&#8217;m keeping my eye on you, Google.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.goingthewongway.com/216/googles-taking-over-the-worldand-i-dont-like-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
